I would go for the people making the AIs. I appreciate why AI safety folks avoid conflict with their ideological opponents, but I'm not in the AI safety community and I'm very angry at the whole situation
Now I've calmed down a bit I'd like to apologise for the threatening tone of this comment. The only violence the capabilities crowd should face is the state-sponsored kind.
Because "state-sponsored" violence is so morally superior--i.e. what you see in the wars in Ukraine, Israel, Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, WWI and WWII ????????????????
What about the old classic move of taking to the streets with pitchforks?
Fighting an AI you can’t control with a violent mob you can’t control? Sounds guaranteed to make things worse.
I would go for the people making the AIs. I appreciate why AI safety folks avoid conflict with their ideological opponents, but I'm not in the AI safety community and I'm very angry at the whole situation
Now I've calmed down a bit I'd like to apologise for the threatening tone of this comment. The only violence the capabilities crowd should face is the state-sponsored kind.
Which we should communicate with the governments that a small minority of nuts want us all to die and we should stop their terrorism.
What? And stop the wild appreciation of my AI stocks, like NVDA and SMCI?
My children and humanity > your stocks
Because "state-sponsored" violence is so morally superior--i.e. what you see in the wars in Ukraine, Israel, Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, WWI and WWII ????????????????